TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Time Standards on Contractors From:Jo Francis Byrd <jbyrd -at- byrdwrites -dot- com> Date:Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:26:51 -0600
Andrew and I aren't always in agreement, but he makes a valid point: as a
contractor, you are a hired gun. A couple of contracts back I created a totally
worthless help system for a client. This manager wasn't a jerk, but he was an idiot
(yes, there is a difference. You can be either or both!). He knew EXACTLY what he
wanted in the help system. It was stupid, the users wouldn't stay in there more
than a few seconds then never go back...but he didn't ask me to do anything illegal
or unethical. I made my argument in an effort to protect the hapless users, he
wanted it his way, I shut my mouth, did it his way, took comfort in the
non-disclosure agreements, collected my earnings, and got the h*^# outta Dodge!
If you're gonna be a contractor, you have to abide by the golden rule: the clients
gots the gold, the clients makes the rules.
Jo Byrd
Andrew Plato wrote, in part:
> Therefore, focus on what the client asks for, not what you think they need.
>
> I have a client with a networking product. The UI and the way they publish the
> docs is terrible. I documented my suggestions to them in the beginning of the
> project. They did not have time to adopt them. I nodded my head and agreed. Then
> I shut my trap and wrote the docs - according to THEIR plan, THEIR rules, and
> THEIR requirements....
>
> My statement was to suggest to Tony that he keep his opinions and procedures in
> check and do exactly what the client wants. If you want a win-win situation in
> contracting, you are humble, respectful, and you do the job even if you think it
> is stupid.