TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Do Customers Have Implicit, Unspecified Right to Documentati on?
Subject:Re: Do Customers Have Implicit, Unspecified Right to Documentati on? From:"Chris Jackson" <crassick -at- bellsouth -dot- net> To:"Christensen, Kent" <lkchris -at- sandia -dot- gov>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:50:19 -0500
----------
>From: "Christensen, Kent" <lkchris -at- sandia -dot- gov>
>To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
>Subject: re: Do Customers Have Implicit, Unspecified Right to Documentati on?
>Date: Thu, Mar 23, 2000, 12:01 PM
>
><snip> This is typical of the sleaze one encounters in the photo mail order arena.
>
>And this sounds like your company, Joe. <snip>
I don't have the original message anymore, but I don't recall anything in it
that would make me think Joe's company is "sleazy." And it might be that
Joe's company is Joe.
I, like you Kent, get mad when something is done halfway and I've paid money
for it. In this case, though, I don't think we have enough information to
damn one side or the other.
