TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Fw: What's a girl to do? From:wlewis -at- nclogic -dot- com (Wendy Lewis) To:"techwhirlers" <TECHWR-L -at- LISTS -dot- RAYCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 16 May 2000 17:19:21 -0400
Many of you agreed with Barry, I do to an extent but...
We are a 25 person, wholly owned subsidiary of NEC. The marketing guy is
new, but also a big wig at NEC. I am the lone writer at the subsidiary.
I didn't write release notes. I wrote a "What's new in 4.0" doc. His process
was to take that, add sales and distributer info, rewrite my info into the
*passive style* which is corporate standard for release notes, "you
understand" (and you would if you've seen any NEC switch manuals) -- throw
in a few pages of a document the marketing co-op wrote, also passive.
Mix liberally. Post to web site.
I had suggestions of renting a funny movie (ugh), take up kick boxing (?) or
getting drunk. I like the last one best ;-)
>From: Kieffer, Barry <Barry_Kieffer -at- adc -dot- com>
>
>>Wendy, as a sage mentor once told me: "You have to pick your battles
>>carefully".
>>
>>If you send him that "cranky-note" what will you gain?
>>
>>I would go to the marketing person and ask if they really wanted
meaningful
>>feedback. If they answered "yes" I would go over it in a very informal
>>monotone way. I would let no emotion show.
>>
>>My advice: Do nothing today, rent a really funny movie on your way home,
>>laugh your a** off tonight, and tomorrow you should look at this whole
>thing
>>differently.