TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Simultaneous Author Access to files [Cross-posted to HATT And Tec hwr-L]
Subject:Re: Simultaneous Author Access to files [Cross-posted to HATT And Tec hwr-L] From:Max Wyss <prodok -at- prodok -dot- ch> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:35:01 +0200
John,
you are not asking for the holy grail here, but you are asking for
biiig problems. It has been quite a long time fundamental of
networking and document managing to give _write_ access to one and
only one user (read access is OK, as reading does not modify a
document).
Imagine, your five writers makes changes on a file, and all have
write access to the document. Now, also imagine that every one
changes the same sentence. So, which one will now be in the document
when you read it afterwards. OK, all writers changing the same
sentence may be a bit esoteric, but if every writer changes a
different paragraph, it would always be the version which gets saved
last which becomes available. And this one will not have the four
other changed paragraphs.
So, there is a bit a workflow problem. Actually, it would be much
better to give the _editing_ responsibility to one writer, who then
will process all the comments. If this is actually not possible, for
whatever reasons, it would be a good idea to look at the documents
and to chop them up into units for which one single writer has the
responsibility. If that too is not possible, you would have to put
your documentation into a database where again the logical units
would have to be made much smaller, so that there will be no need for
concurrent write access (also, a database would make available the
write permission to a record as soon as the writer has left that
particular record).
Hope, this can help.
Max Wyss
PRODOK Engineering
Low Paper workflows, Smart documents, PDF forms
CH-8906 Bonstetten, Switzerland
I have five writers in my group, and we're constantly tripping each other up
when we try to access our files for updating. Currently we're using Word 97
(Word 2000 just doesn't cut it) and ForeHelp. Neither of these tools lets us
work efficiently as a group since only one person can have read/write access
to any one file at a time.
Are there ANY tools and/or Document Management Systems that will let us have
free rein to open and edit whatever needs editing, regardless of whether
someone else is using it or not? Or am I asking for the Holy Grail here?
Thanks ... and I'd also like to hear how many of you are running into the
same problem. If it's a big deal, perhaps the tool vendors will take notice
and add more DMS capabilities to their applications.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn how to develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver!
Dec. 7-8, 2000, Orlando, FL -- $100 discount for STC members. http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.
Your web site localized into 32 languages? Maybe not now, but sooner than
you think. Download ForeignExchange's FREE paper, "3 steps to successful
translation management" at http://www.fxtrans.com/3steps.html?tw.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.