RE: The Problem with STC

Subject: RE: The Problem with STC
From: "Michael West" <mike -dot- west -at- oz -dot- quest -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:46:49 +1100

Andrew Plato writes:

>There is just a lot of poor communicators out there.

I can hardly improve on that remark, though it is
tempting to try.

Mr Plato's views and mine are almost diametrically
opposed. He believes that detailed technical
knowledge is an "infinitely" more important element
in technical communications than core communications
skills. No-one can question his right to such an
eccentric opinion, but when someone takes a
position so radically opposed to the accepted
wisdom and to mountains of empirical evidence
to the contrary, he has, as a certain Cuban
bandleader used to say, a lotta splainin to do.

Expert communicators (technical or otherwise)
know how to develop an effective strategy for
communicating clearly and successfully on just
about any topic. Conversely, poor communicators
can fail to communicate on any topic, no matter
how much they think they know about it.

If Mr Plato's views were correct, there would be
no need for technical communications at all as
a professional practice. Vendors of technical
products could simply let their engineers educate
their users.

By the way, this has been tried and found
unworkable.

Mr Plato suggests that "English or language classes
in college and high school" are adequate preparation
for the "communications" side of technical
communications, and that all one needs after that is
in-depth technical knowledge of some small,
specialized focal area in order to qualify as a
developer of high-quality end-user assistance

material.

The fact is, high school and college English classes
are only a foundation on which professional-level
communications skills can be built-- in the same
way that high-school and college classes in
symbolic logic, mathematics and engineering are a
only a foundation upon which programming skills can
be built.

I've worked with some excellent communicators who
came from technical backgrounds, but their
backgrounds were largely incidental to their
communications skills, and made them no more
skilled than others who came from education
or journalism.

Mr Plato has made his views on technical
communications quite clear. What I can't
figure out is why, given his low opinion of
the field, he is involved with it at all.

--
Michael West
Technical Writer
Melbourne, Australia


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY.
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Take XML and Tech Writing courses online! Our instructor-led courses
(4-6 hrs/wk) give you "hands on" experience at your convenience. STC members
get 20% off! http://www.online-learning.com/index.html.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: The Problem with STC
Next by Author: RE: The Problem with STC
Previous by Thread: Re: The Problem with STC
Next by Thread: Re: The Problem with STC


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads