RE: References for "The Magic Number" and more examples of the number 7

Subject: RE: References for "The Magic Number" and more examples of the number 7
From: edunn -at- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:20:03 -0500



While this discussion ranks up there with the 'number of spaces after a period'
debate (that is currently raging on Framers, heaven help me), I feel I have to
speak up.
In a recent post, a supporter of the 7+/-2 lambasted the referenced articles and
posters that are against Miller's study as being without proof/study and of
being only personal opinions. After visiting the referenced web sites, I can say
this is patently untrue. The three web sites that have been referenced to
'debunk' Miller's study all seemed to be from the view point of learned people
with a grasp of the latest scientific study (not just a passing knowledge of one
1956 study). Unless someone can point out how the references are falsified, I
think the list (included below) speaks for itself.
Argue/discuss the merits of a position as much as you want. But to dismiss them
out of hand as unsupported when in fact they are is intellectually dishonest.
Besides, personal viewpoints amongst such an experienced group such as TECHWR-L
should carry at least as much weight as a study carried out in the early 50's.

Eric L. Dunn

References
1. Beebe-Center, J.G., Rogers, M.S., and O'Connell, D.N. Transmission of
information about sucrose and saline solutions through the sense of taste. J.
Psychol., 1955, 39, 157-160.
2. Bousfield, W.A., and Cohen, B.H. The occurrence of clustering in the recall
of randomly arranged words of different frequencies-of-usage. J. Gen. Psychol.,
1955, 52, 83-95.
3. Carmichael, L., Hogan, H.P., and Walter, A.A. An experimental study of the
effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. J. Exp.
Psychol., 1932, 15, 73-86.
4. Chapman, D.W. Relative effects of determinate and indeterminate Aufgaben.
Amer. J. Psychol., 1932, 44, 163-174.
5. Eriksen, C.W. Multidimensional stimulus differences and accuracy of
discrimination. USAF, WADC Tech. Rep., 1954, No. 54-165.
6. Eriksen, C.W., and Hake, H.W. Absolute judgments as a function of the
stimulus range and the number of stimulus and response categories. J. Exp.
Psychol., 1955, 49, 323-332.
7. Garner, W.R. An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. J.
Exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 373-380.
8. Hake, H.W., and Garner, W.R. The effect of presenting various numbers of
discrete steps on scale reading accuracy. J. Exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 358-366.
9. Halsey, R.M., and Chapanis, A. Chromaticity-confusion contours in a complex
viewing situation. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1954, 44, 442-454.
10. Hayes, J.R.M. Memory span for several vocabularies as a function of
vocabulary size. In Quarterly Progress Report, Cambridge, Mass.: Acoustics
Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jan.-June, 1952.
11. Jakobson, R., Fant, C.G.M., and Halle, M. Preliminaries to speech analysis.
Cambridge, Mass.: Acoustics Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
1952. (Tech. Rep. No. 13.).
12. Kaufman, E.L., Lord, M.W., Reese, T.W., and Volkmann, J. The discrimination
of visual number. Amer. J. Psychol., 1949, 62, 498-525.
13. Klemmer, E.T., and Frick, F.C. Assimilation of information from dot and
matrix patterns. J. Exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 15-19.
14. Külpe, O. Versuche über Abstraktion. Ber. ü. d. I Kongr. f. Exper. Psychol.,
1904, 56-68.
15. Miller, G.A., and Nicely, P.E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among
some English consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1955, 27, 338-352.
16. Pollack, I. The assimilation of sequentially encoded information. Amer. J.
Psychol., 1953, 66, 421-435.
17. Pollack, I. The information of elementary auditory displays. J. Acoust. Soc.
Amer., 1952, 24, 745-749.
18. Pollack, I. The information of elementary auditory displays. II. J. Acoust.
Soc. Amer., 1953, 25, 765-769.
19. Pollack, I., and Ficks, L. Information of elementary multidimensional
auditory displays. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1954, 26, 155-158.
20. Woodworth, R.S. Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1938.

REFERENCES
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1994). The magical number seven: Still magic after all these
years? Psychological Review, 101, 353-356.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology,
4, 55-81.
Cowan, N. (1995) Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Crowder, R. G. (1967). Prefix effects in immediate memory. Canadian Journal of
Psychology, 21, 450-461.
Ellis, N. C., & Hennelly, R. A. (1980). A bilingual word-length effect:
Implications for intelligence testing and the relative ease of mental
calculations in Welsh and English. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 43-52.
Galitz, W. O. (1997). Essential guide to user interface design: An introduction
to GUI design principles and techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Greene, R. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Helander, M. G., Landauer, T. K., & Prabhu, P. V. (Eds.)(1997). Handbook of
human-computer interaction (second edition). North-Holland: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands.
Hulme, C., Maughan, & Brown, G.D.A. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar
words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term span. Journal
of Memory and Language, 30, 685-701.
LeCompte, D. C. (1996). Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal
distinctiveness: A new approach to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1154-1165.
LeCompte, D. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1993). Similarity as an organizing principle
in short-term memory. Memory, 1, 3-11.
Martin, R. C., & Lesch M. F. (1996). Associations and dissociations between
language impairment and list recall: Implications for models of STM. In S. E.
Gathercole (Ed.) Models of Short-term Memory, (pp. 149-178). Hove, UK:
Psychology Press.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on
our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97
Neath, I. (1998). Human memory: An introduction to research, data, and theory.
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Schiano, D. J., & Watkins, M. J. (1981). Speech-like coding of pictures in
short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 9, 100-114.
Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective
human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Spool, J. M., Scanlon, T., Schroeder, W., Snyder, C., and DeAngelo, T. (1997).
Web site usability: A designer's guide. North Andover, MA: User Interface
Engineering.
Stigler, Lee, & Stevenson (1986). Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence
for a temporally limited store. Cognition, 23, 1-20.
Tulving, E., & Patkau, J. E. (1962). Concurrent effects of contextual constraint
and word frequency on immediate recall and learning of verbal material.
Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 83-95.
Watkins, M. J. (1974). Concept and measurement of primary memory. Psychological
Bulletin, 81, 95-711.
Watkins, M. J. (1977). The intricacy of memory span. Memory &Cognition, 5,
529-534.

References
Baddeley, A. (1992), Working memory, Science, 255, 556-559.
Broadbent, D.E. (1975), The magic number seven after fifteen years. In A.
Kennedy and A. Wilkes (eds.), Studies in Long-Term Memory, New York: Wiley,
3-18.
Brown, J. (1958), Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory, Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12-21.
LeCompte, D. (1999), Seven, plus or minus two, is too much to bear: Three (or
fewer) is the real magic number, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society, 289-292.
MacGregor, J.N. (1987), Short-term memory capacity: Limitation or optimization?
Psychological Review, 94(1), 107-108.
Miller, G.A. (1956), The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on
our capacity for processing information, The Psychological Review, 81-97.
Peterson, L.R. and Peterson, M.J. (1959), Short-term retention of individual
items, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY.
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Take XML and Tech Writing courses online! Our instructor-led courses
(4-6 hrs/wk) give you "hands on" experience at your convenience. STC members
get 20% off! http://www.online-learning.com/index.html.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Pulling it slightly OT: TW Salaries--Is it me, or are people greedier (Mild Vent)
Next by Author: RE: References for "The Magic Number" and more examples of the number 7
Previous by Thread: Re: Convince vs. Persuade (WAS: Displays versus Appears )
Next by Thread: RE: References for "The Magic Number" and more examples of the number 7


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads