TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I don't know, maybe it's my audience, I saw that response here from someone
that it does depend on the audience. Mine is a strictly financial type
audience, some of them, this is their first introduction (in some cases) to
a computer. Part of my job functionality was that since this is usually NEW
software for the client, that I have to walk them through it.
Is it more of a usability thing? I'm curious now. Someone else said it was
a "pet peeve." What makes "Click here for..." undesirable? I'm asking
because I really want to know if I should change using this terminology?
Tanya Owens is developing <<... web based training, and throughout the
training I advise the learner to "Click here" to access additional
information. For instance "Click here to go to the top of the page." ... A
co-worker claims that "Click here" is archaic, that I should just say "Top"
and "Navigation Tips.">>
It's hard for me to imagine anything less than 20 years old as being
"archaic", though I confess to being old enough (pushing 40) to consider
"archaic" as referring only to things older than me. <g> It's certainly
likely that most users will recognize the standard hyperlinking convention
of underlined words (e.g., _underlined_) or links set aside in a special
navigation bar, but whether that's true in your case will depend on your
specific audience. If you're in any doubt, make sure lesson 1 provides
instructions on "how to navigate", and make that lesson optional for those
who already know how to mouse their way around.
I'm generally comfortable with hyperlinks that simply read "More
information", with the underlining meaning "click here to get..." But this
can be awfully terse within running text, and it works better for a
navigation button or list of links that stand alone, outside the text. You
can generally write your way ever so elegantly around the need to be
explicit by using a phrase such as "more information appears in _Appendix
1_". Where that works, there's certainly no need to say "click here". Where
the flow of the text requires something more overt, the occasional "click
here", archaic though it may be to those who grew up measuring time in
Internet years, may be perfectly suitable.
<snip>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY. http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.
Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001
Conference East, June 4-5, Baltimore/Washington D.C. area. http://www.pdfconference.com or toll-free 877/278-2131.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
