Re: FWD: Re: Would you like a fries with that style guide, redux

Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Would you like a fries with that style guide, redux
From: barry batorsky <bbatorsk -at- nj -dot- devry -dot- edu>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 13:44:14 -0400

First a correction. In the equation (and please have tolerance for the
fact that my email doesn't allow for subscripts, p/d--I thought it might be
clear from the natural language version that p and d are intended as
subscripts--think of it as a misspelling):

Q(p/d) x (E+C) = R:

I mispoke when I said "C" stood for Competence, of course it can't. It
stands for Commitment. btw, I copied the equation from a book: It's not
my statement. Thanks whoever it was who pointed out that you can't get a
result from just a plan and competence. (As I say to the students in my
algebra class when they pick up an error I make, "That's why you're here.")

Also, the Result of zero Effort and zero Commitment is zero since (E+C) is
a factor and would equal zero. Someone raised that issue.

To the issue that these variables are not quantifiable. They surely are.
It's the way I get my raises, and my boss justifies his conclusions with
evaluative numbers. Is there subjectivity involved? Of course, because
judgments are involved. But I don't think anyone would claim that we don't
calculate probabilities or make judgments (or plans) without projecting
costs and benefits. We quantify our effort and commitment all the time.

Finally, I am sorry that I reprinted Dick's personal note to the list.
When I hit "reply" to anything on this list, I always get the personal
address, and automatically cut and paste the listserv address. I didn't
notice that Dick's post was a private one. I promise to be more careful in
the future.

Oh yes, the distinction I made between the writing process and the
documentation process wasn't clear to some. All I meant was that I teach
the writing process to freshman, but technical writing to upper level
students. The first parallels the second in the essentials, but is not the
same. I was using the term "documentation" to indicate what I also call,
variously, "organizational", "technical", or "professional" writing. Trust
me, the two classes are very different. Is that a claim that I own the
truth? No, but I think it does establish my credentials, which is a
legitimate argument.

Eppur si muove,
Barry



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27. http://www.pdfconference.com.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Would you like a fries with that style guide, redux
Next by Author: RE: Techwriting and Personality
Previous by Thread: Re: Acrobat 5
Next by Thread: Pronouns and portfolios?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads