Not again: certification?

Subject: Not again: certification?
From: "Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:10:36 -0400

Bryan Westbrook reports: <<In the case of doctors, there is a recognized,
authoritative governing body that licenses them. STC has no clear right to
declare themselves as such. BTW, I am not knocking STC, per se, and am
actually a member. I just don't think they need to be overstepping their
bounds on this issue.>>

To clarify this point: STC is not attempting to claim and enforce sole
responsibility for certification of all technical communicators, everywhere
(unlike regional medical and engineering associations). Instead, what they
would be offering is a voluntary certification process that would ideally
guarantee a minimum standard of competence; the goal would be to provide a
measure of reassurance to employers who are hiring and who have had bad
experiences with "self-appointed" experts in the past. Various editorial
associations have followed or are following a similar process; the Council
of Biology (now "Science") Editors already has such a voluntary
certification in place, and it's well-respected in the editing community,
and the Editors' Association of Canada is trying to develop such a program.
Many professional translation associations offer similar credentials.

Personally, I oppose certification for our profession for a large variety of
reasons that I won't bring up here; none of them are enough to make me
militantly opposed to ***voluntary*** certification. But I certainly
understand why STC wants to make certification available (it gives our
profession more of a "professional" appearance and increases our visibility)
and why employers would look favorably on this initiative (it decreases but
does not eliminate the chances of hiring an incompetent employee). I find
neither argument persuasive, but I do understand them.

--Geoff Hart, FERIC, Pointe-Claire, Quebec
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
"User's advocate" online monthly at
www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/usersadvocate.html

"I vowed [that] if I complained about things more than three times, I had to
do something about it."--Jon Shear

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27. http://www.pdfconference.com.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Has anyone had a good STC conference experience?
Next by Author: Not again: certification? (Take II)
Previous by Thread: Re: Voice-activated software
Next by Thread: Re: Not again: certification?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads