Re: Supremes rule for freelancers

Subject: Re: Supremes rule for freelancers
From: Peter <pnewman1 -at- home -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:37:08 -0400

John Locke wrote:
>
> Well, I guess the main point of contention is, do you really own what you
> write? To play devil's advocate and carry the argument to an extreme, all
> the words we use are in the dictionary--can Daniel Webster (& his heirs)
> claim copyright to the entire English Language? Obviously not.
>

Generally, it is not the words that you own. It is the compilation of
those words that is the subject of the copyright.

--
Peter
Mailto:peternew -at- optonline -dot- net

Adapting old programs to fit new machines
usually means adapting new machines to
behave like old ones.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by Cub Lea, specialist in low-cost outsourced development
and documentation. Overload and time-sensitive jobs at exceptional
rates. Unique free gifts for all visitors to http://www.cublea.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: Supremes rule for freelancers: From: John Locke

Previous by Author: Re: Starting a business
Next by Author: Re: Warm and Fuzzy Documentation
Previous by Thread: RE: Supremes rule for freelancers
Next by Thread: Re: FW: Supremes rule for freelancers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads