RE: More ethics... (long, of course)

[bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com]

In other words, it protects the profit motive of the writer and the
publisher.  Otherwise, why should they bother?  This just goes right back to
what Andrew (and others) has been saying for days now.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Shaeffer [mailto:jims -at- spsi -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:59 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: More ethics... (long, of course)

The following is from http://www.jps.net/dcm/copyright/
(Note that copyright is seen as being in society's 
interest, not the author's, not the publisher's.) 
-------------------------------------------
[Without copyright protection] anyone foolish 
enough to print a new work would, if the work were 
successful, be immediately undercut on the market, 
suddenly no publisher was willing to print new works,
and there was no market for new ideas.

The Copyright Act [1709] served to create a market,
but it was not designed to protect the publisher 
or author, but rather society's interest in new ideas.
--------------------------------------------


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and 
three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe.  http://ieeepcs.org/2001/

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit 
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.