Re: HTML editor: does everyone need to be on the same page?

Subject: Re: HTML editor: does everyone need to be on the same page?
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 18:05:21 -0700

Stegall, Sarah wrote:


Secondly, I think the attitude that everyone on the writing team should be
using the same tool to produce code with is dangerous; proprietary WYSIWYG
editors almost always impose idiosyncratic code that can render your
finished product accessible only to a specialized audience.


While you're right that proprietary tools often add idiosyncratic code, it's an overstatement that this code reduces accessibility. It can have some unexpected side-effects, but usually the code can still be parsed by your average browser.

But the real problem is not so much a single set of idiosyncratic code as the results when a mix occurs. I once had the misfortune to work with HTMl code that had been passed through PageMill, Front Page, and Netscape Composer. At this late date, I couldn't tell you what each one added, but the overall effect was horrendous, especially when I tried to get a consistent display in different browsers. In the end, I ended up removing all the idiosyncratic code, a process that took up far more time than was saved by using a WYSIWYG editor.

Under these circumstances, settling on one tool is sensible. You only have one set of idiosyncratic code to worry about, and you have a chance of knowing what it is if you want to remove it.

Needless to say, a far better solution would be to work with tools that didn't add junk. If input is slower, then editing and cleanup might be faster than with a WYSIWYG tool. However, in many shops, I don't think that this solution would be considered, so settling on a single WYSIWYG tool is a reasonable alternative.

However, a shop shouldn't simply settle on a single tool, but a single version and release of that tool as well. As we all know, a certain large, proprietary company has a habit of undermining its own arguments by changing with each release the functionality of the very tools that it urges everyone to use for consistency's sake.

--
Bruce Byfield 604.421.7177 bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com

"We feel the breeze from the storm to come,
And up and down this coast
We're waiting for the wheel to turn."
-Capercaillie, "Clearances"


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe. http://ieeepcs.org/2001/

+++ Miramo -- Database/XML publishing automation. See us at +++
+++ Seybold SFO, Sept. 25-27, in the Adobe Partners Pavilion +++
+++ More info: http://www.axialinfo.com http://www.miramo.com +++

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: HTML editor: does everyone need to be on the same page?: From: Stegall, Sarah

Previous by Author: Re: Archimedes Socrates, ace tech writer, wins another one
Next by Author: Re: Archimedes Socrates, ace tech writer, wins another one
Previous by Thread: RE: HTML editor: does everyone need to be on the same page?
Next by Thread: RE: HTML editor: does everyone need to be on the same page?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads