Re: Tech-Reading vs. Other Reading

Subject: Re: Tech-Reading vs. Other Reading
From: CC <texchanchan -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:16:31 -0700 (PDT)

Re,
> Also, reading for pleasure is not quite the same
> activity as reading for information.

True. But...

> Reading for information is about finding and
absorbing
> facts quickly. By contrast, reading for pleasure is
> a much slower activity.

Exactly the opposite here. I race through novels at
top speed, read tech lit slowly.

C. Crowley

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: Tech-Reading vs. Other Reading: From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: Re: Tech-Reading vs. Other Reading
Next by Author: RE: Example of synopsis
Previous by Thread: Re: Tech-Reading vs. Other Reading
Next by Thread: Re: Tech-Reading vs. Other Reading


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads