Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."

Subject: Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
From: Sabahat Ashraf <sabahat -at- viragelogic -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:07:40 -0800


> Frankly, deliver us from ANYONE concerned about the "artistic beauty" of
> technical documentation at the expense of solid, useable information.

Ah, the beauty of solid, usable information ....<g,d,r>

<from a safe distance>Sorry; that was too tempting...

SIA

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation...": From: Tom Murrell

Previous by Author: Re: HUMOUR: Blame Guide Also Re: Auto
Next by Author: Functional résumés; no dates on résumés (WAS RE:_Hobbies_on_a_résumé)
Previous by Thread: Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
Next by Thread: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads