TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>I think there's a difference between trying to convince the
interviewer that
you're willing to play the games necessary to be part of the team as a
permanent
employee and convincing the interviewer that you have the stuff
necessary to do
the job he/she needs done better/faster than any other candidate.
True. But the two games do have some similarities. In both cases, you
put on a persona to please the other person, or at least try to say the
right things, which was probably what the original poster was getting at.
> One of the reasons I chose to become a contractor many years ago was
because I
no longer wanted to play the head games ill-prepared interviewers use when
looking for permanent employees.
You said it. The process is especially wearisome when you know exactly
what the interviewer is trying to do and not only know f the theory
behind the head games, but understand that they're twenty years out of
date and as crazy as a soup sandwich. In this situation, exactly the
**worst** thing you can do is prompt the interviewer when they don't get
the theory quite right; it shows that you know what what's going on, and
that's disturbing to someone who imagines that they're being clever and
manipulative. Instead, you have to keep a straight face, and give the
right answer. And that's hard for me, partly because I get impatient
going through the dogeared script, but mainly because I keep having the
perverse temptation to give the wrong answer, just to make the interview
less boring. But, as I constantly observe, I don't go about these things
the right way.
(Which reminds me of George Macdonald Fraser's "The General Danced At
Dawn," in which the protagonist, shortly after World War II, is being
tested at officer's school by a psychiatrist. In the word association
test, he knows that sane answers are "Freud" for "Father" and "Betty
Grable" for "Sex," but ends up scribbling "Father Grable" for "Sex" as
he's torn by the same perversity. Watching, the psychiatrist is making
gulpingnoises of disbelief).
As a contractor, the process is much cleaner. The interview is more
nearly equal. As a result, the head game preliminaries either don't
appear or last a much shorter time. As the interviewee, my main concern
is to appear professional and reliable, while the interviewer's main
concern is whether I seem able to do the job. Maybe the difference is
that, as a contractor, I'm more likely to be talking to someone like the
CTO, rather than an HR person full of half-digested, stale ideas.
--
Bruce Byfield 604.421.7177 bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com
"So watch all you sailors, who spend your leave ashore,
You'll have to get up early to be smarter than a whore,
Your coat and watch will disappear, your hat and boots as well,
'Cause New York girls are tougher than the other side of hell."
- Traditional, "New York Girls (Can You Dance the Polka?)"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Be a published author! iUniverse gives you: a high-quality paperback, a
custom cover design, and distribution to 25,00 retailers. Join our almost
10,000 published authors today. http://www.iuniverse.com/publish/default.asp
Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.