RE: Quality of source material from Development

Subject: RE: Quality of source material from Development
From: Suzi Magill <SMagill -at- adaytum -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:36:06 -0600

I totally agree with Andrew Plato's post. I would much rather take a spec
and run with it and work with the developers. I dont just want to "edit"
someone elses info just to make it look like a user doc- which I suspect
Option 1 would provide me.

Being a power user on the product should also be mandatory too.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Author: Framemaker 6.0
Previous by Thread: Re: Quality of source material from Development
Next by Thread: RE: Quality of source material from Development


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads