TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:QUERY: spelling, e.g. or eg From:Brian Hooper <hooperbc -at- mindspring -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:27:20 -0800
Lately, in tech documentation, I've been seeing "for example"
abbreviated as "eg" and not "e.g.". Is this a new accepted spelling for
it?
Forgive me if the question is more for the copyediting list. But since
I've been seeing this term in so many tech docs, I thought maybe tech
departments may now have begun deferring to a different preferred
abbreviation for "for example."
Thank you.
Brian
--
Brian C. Hooper
Writer/Editor and Web Text Analyst
"The art of life lies in a constant readjustment to our surroundings." -
Okakura Kabuzo
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.