names for doc statuses

Subject: names for doc statuses
From: "Ednie, Catherine" <CEdnie -at- Eventra -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:27:12 -0500


Something came up this morning (Monday morning already, ack) about
terminology for naming documents at different stages of the development
process. The discussion was really a disguised version of the argument about
when a doc is "done." I wanted the document to be more than a "draft"
because that didn't convey how much work had gone into it and how clean it
was at this point. He suggested "preliminary version." What do you call a
manual that has been fully edited, reviewed (albeit briefly and quickly) by
developers, and ready to enter QA and subsequent reviews? Do you have
different names to describe a doc as it moves through the process? (sub
question - do you use the term "final draft"? seems like an oxymoron to me)

BTW, I just ordered a copy of Hackos "Managing..." this morning. I've got to
get a better handle on this process. I work for a company with a very weak
tech pubs department and I'm trying to change corporate culture in my own
small way...

Catherine Ednie
eventra, Inc.
203-882-9988 ext. 2610
cednie -at- eventra -dot- com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

Are you using Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp? Switch to RoboHelp for Word for $249
or to RoboHelp Office for only $499. Get the PC Magazine five-star rated
Help authoring tool for less! Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: techwr-l digest: April 08, 2002
Next by Author: RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers
Previous by Thread: RE: Re: Software that retrieves developer comments from code
Next by Thread: Re: names for doc statuses


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads