Re: Making better standards

Subject: Re: Making better standards
From: Sandy Harris <pashley -at- storm -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:15:49 -0400


Jonathan West wrote:
>
> Hi whirlers,
>
> Starting next month, I'm going to be taking part in a project at ETSI
> (European Telecoms Standards Institute) writing some documents providing
> guidance to ETSI's technical committees on "making better standards".

Useful work!

There's an RFC that defines terms like MUST and SHOULD as they are to be
used in IETF documents.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt
and guidelines for authors:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt

Also -- and I'm definitely wearing an evil grin as I suggest this -- you
might want to find a copy of Mike Padlipsky's "Elements of Networking
Style". It is almost certainly the funniest technical book ever written,
a really vicious critique of the ISO seven-layer nonsense, with chapter
titles like "Low standards: a critique of X.25". It was written mid-80s
so it's now badly out of date, but still worth reading. If you cannot
find the book, several chapters were published as RFCs, 871 to 875 I
think.

> I'm especially interested in the thoughts of those of you who are landed
> with the job of trying to read, understand and implement the standards
> rather than just those who write them. I suspect that far too many standards
> are written an a way that makes them all but impenetrable to anyone other
> than those who participated in the committee that wrote them. If you are a
> standards user, then I particularly want to hear from you.
>
> I'm not able to chase into technical issues on individual standards, but
> would be willing to obtain and look at individual documents if they can be
> used to illustrate a more general point.

One to look at would be the various critiques of the IPsec standards
(RFCs 2401-2409, 2451 and a few others). My docs for FreeS/WAN, the
Linux implementation of those standards, include:

a list of the RFCs:
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.95/doc/rfc.html

my shot at a simple explanation of them:
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.95/doc/ipsec.html#ipsec.detail

links to the critiques:
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.95/doc/web.html#analysis
Especially, see the Schneier and Ferguson paper.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

Are you using Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp? Switch to RoboHelp for Word for $249
or to RoboHelp Office for only $499. Get the PC Magazine five-star rated
Help authoring tool for less! Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Poll suggestion: Lurkers: From: tom -dot- green -at- iwon -dot- com
Making better standards: From: Jonathan West

Previous by Author: Re: Tales from the "_ _ _ crypt"
Next by Author: Re: Maximize and Minimize
Previous by Thread: Making better standards
Next by Thread: Re: Making better standards


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads