Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)

Subject: Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
From: "Jeanne A. E. DeVoto" <jaed -at- jaedworks -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:48:44 -0700


At 10:29 AM -0700 4/21/2002, Bruce Byfield wrote:
>Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
>>No magic wand needed, as far as I've ever been able to tell. If when you
>>publish your schedule, the deadlines are clearly conditioned on development
>>milestones, and someone else on the team translates that into calendar
>>dates, doesn't shift your dates when your dependencies shift, and forgets
>>that you haven't committed to "May 5th, come hell or high water!", then
>>that is not your problem, is it? Your schedule is clear, and bad
>>assumptions on someone else's part don't constitute an emergency on your
>>part.
>>
>Well, I suppose you can work that way. But, for my part, I've never
>believed that tech-writing was simply a matter of keeping your head down
>and doing your immediate job while ignoring how you interact with
>others. So far as I'm concerned, part of the responsibility is keeping
>others informed. If your dependencies shift and the schedule doesn't,
>then you owe it to everyone you're working with to let them know and to
>work to change the schedule.

Well, of course. This should go without saying.

The problem comes in when you do see that there's a problem in updating the
schedule, and inform people, and your information is ignored (or management
gives you flak for "changing your schedule and endangering the project
schedule"). In this case, your published schedule, which clearly delineates
your dependencies and specifies exactly when your work is due, protects you
from such unfair blaming tactics.

Naturally, if you see that others are depending on an outdated schedule,
you point it out and help them determine the actual schedule.

(Side note: has my writing tone gone completely off the wall in the past
week without my realizing it, or what? Twice now I've gotten responses that
seem to me to be both snarkily disrespectful and dismissive of any
pretensions to professionalism I might have, and unjustified by what I've
actually said, from list members who do not normally behave this way. It's
bothering me.)

--
jeanne a. e. devoto ~ jaed -at- jaedworks -dot- com
http://www.jaedworks.com




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you using Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp? Switch to RoboHelp for Word for $249
or to RoboHelp Office for only $499. Get the PC Magazine five-star rated
Help authoring tool for less! Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant): From: Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant): From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: RE: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
Next by Author: SUMMARY (part 2): Project plan risk assessment / risk analysis / risk management
Previous by Thread: Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)
Next by Thread: Re: Ever wonder why techwhirler lives seem so crazy? (a long rant)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads