Re: Standards wrt paper and standards

Subject: Re: Standards wrt paper and standards
From: Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- jci -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:57:17 -0500


>I mean, if you would ask the average Joe or Jane Blow if they know what A4
>is, would they know?

Are Joe and Jane connected with printing in any way? I ask because the
average person off the street here, if asked about A4 would come up with a
German car designation before they came up with a paper size.

But most people over here involved with printing have an idea of A4, if
only because the printer paper trays have a setting for it. ;{>}

>Reason for this is that one of the guys in the thread about this mentioned
>the authors for ghostscript used parts of inches to approximate the size
of
>an A4 format, which is, of course, not useful at all.

That's a rather parochial mindset, isn't it? Inches or mm, they both can
describe the exact same size.

>How close is the industry and the general public towards accepting the
>Internation Standards [SI] units and other format standards used widely
over
>the world, with the common exception of the USA?

The measurement units? Industry is very close to accepting, the general
public is not only resistant but actively hostile to. The format standards,
such as A4? For even a large part of the industry the attitude seems to be,
"over my dead body." It's funny, but even in the CAD systems, where it's
common to speak of "A-size drawings" and the measurements are in mm as
often as inches, the paper is *not* A4.

Whole filing systems depend upon 8.5 x 11 inches; ISTM that's not likely to
change until the paper files themselves go away.

Have fun,
Arlen
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 224

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
----------------------------------------------
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
----------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are mine and mine alone.
If JCI had an opinion on this, they'd hire someone else to deliver it.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you using Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp? Switch to RoboHelp for Word for $249
or to RoboHelp Office for only $499. Get the PC Magazine five-star rated
Help authoring tool for less! Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr

Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Font Selection Methodology
Next by Author: Re: Font Selection Methodology
Previous by Thread: Standards wrt paper and standards
Next by Thread: Re: Standards wrt paper and standards


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads