Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line

Subject: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
From: letoured -at- together -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 01:46:39 -0400


In <3D4F0E40 -dot- 48FF648E -at- optonline -dot- net>, on 08/05/02
at 07:46 PM, Peter <pnewman1 -at- optonline -dot- net> said:


>letoured -at- together -dot- net wrote:

>> You understood what I meant. Of course if you want to make the argument that
>> you didn't understand, go ahead -- but writers who work on utility systems,
>> chemical plants, railroads, shipbuilding, military equipment, and more -- know
>> them quite well.
>>
>> They work and very well, unless the writer is a complete dummy taking things
>> to the extreme <s> -- which not only wouldn't get past the sign-off review,
>> but neither would the writer if he ever tried it again.
>
>Of course I understand what you meant. As others have pointed out it depends
>on who you are writing for. If he intended user is the general public than
>the old saying "stupidity has no bounds" is applicable. It is always a
>judgment call as to how far you take your warnings. Unfortunately, many look
>upon an accident as an enrichment opportunity. "It wasn't my fault, nobody
>told me I could break away if I walked out the open window from the fourth
>floor." In one case that I am familiar with, the worker removed a safety
>guard from the equipment and as a result was injured. The theory of his
>lawsuit was that the safety guard was too easy to remove and he was not
>instructed not to remove the safety guard.

That would come under the doctrine of comparative negligence... So the URL on
the lawsuit where the worker was successful is what?



-----------------------------------------------------------
letoured -at- together -dot- net
-----------------------------------------------------------



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Save up to 50% with RoboHelp Deluxe. Get 2 great products for 1 low price!
You'll get RoboHelp Office PLUS RoboDemo, the software demonstration tool
that everyone's been talking about. Check it out and save!
http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

TECHWR-L is supported by ads and sponsorships...and donations.
You can help maintain the TECHWR-L community with donations
at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/abouttechwhirl/donate.html

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line: From: Peter

Previous by Author: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
Next by Author: RE: About proprietary writing samples
Previous by Thread: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line
Next by Thread: Re: "Obvious" warnings - drawing the line


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads