RE: terminology question (and a bit of a rant)

Subject: RE: terminology question (and a bit of a rant)
From: "Anameier, Christine A - Eagan, MN" <CANAMEIE -at- email -dot- usps -dot- gov>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:10:00 -0400


> . . . along comes a style guide, that you wrote, where everything
> you like (your style) is in the style guide as good, and
> everything you don't like (their style) is not in the manual,
> or documented as bad style.
>
> Not long on credibility, dontchathink?.

Yeah, that's the other problem with the style guide idea.

> But I LIKE screen shots in the help...

We're talking about the term "screen"... not screenshots.

> Tell me...is the problem that their document is SO bad that
> the product will be less usable because of what they've
> done, or are you afraid that someone will see what you
> did as redundant?

Aw, come on, John--give Rosemary some credit here. She wrote it first and, I'd
bet, wrote it better; hers is not the redundant version. I think it's safe to
assume she's concerned about usability.

Christine


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out the new release of RoboDemo, our easy-to-use tutorial software.
Plus, buy RoboHelp Office in August and save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Get details and download free trial versions at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Acrobat & FrameMaker Seminars: PDF Best Practices, FrameMaker-to-Acrobat
Advanced Techniques, FM Template Design, Single Sourcing with FrameMaker
in Brussels (Oct), and in Montreal & Dallas (Dec): http://www.microtype.com/1

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re:terminology question (and a bit of a rant)
Next by Author: RE: Knowledge Management
Previous by Thread: RE: terminology question (and a bit of a rant)
Next by Thread: RE: terminology question (and a bit of a rant)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads