TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Linux users who like Windows From:Steven Oppenheimer <writer -at- writemaster -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Sat, 28 Sep 2002 12:15:59 -0700
I haven't used Linux yet, but there is a fourth reason why Linux is of
interest to me, in addition to the three given by Bruce below. And I think
this same reason will apply to other users as well, and hopefully to major
corporations in the near future.
Say someone owns three computers (home office, laptop, and a computer at a
family home out of state). Up until Windows 98, a user might have no
compunction about installing one copy of Windows on all three computers,
licensing agreements be damned. The computers are used by one owner, and
only that owner, and it is ridiculous that he or she should pay for three
copies of the operating system for one user. Same for MS Office, and MS
Developer Studio that is used for programming. Now, with the registration
feature, Bill Gates virtually locks us into paying for three copies of his
software, one for each computer. That's a huge outlay of money for an
individual, and it is for a corporation as well.
I don't go out and buy software and pass it around to twenty people. But
if I have two or three computers, and I am the exclusive user (or even the
prime user), there is no reason not to have one copy of the software PER
USER rather than PER MACHINE.
Gates, Balmer & Co., have a legitimate stake in preventing endless piracy
of their software. If the software allowed up to, say, 15 "no questions
asked" installs per license, I would think that was fair. That would
allow, say, for an install on three machines; and on each machine it would
allow for four additional installs, taking into account changes of hardware
in the machine, software conflicts or viruses that crash the machine,
etc. But 2 -- count 'em 2 installs - per license. It's ridiculous. As if
Bill Gates could only afford to buy about eight aircraft carriers, that's
how much wealth he has, instead he needs nine or ten.
I think (hope!?) that corporations are going to get wise, and start making
Linux their primary operating system. When that happens, applications like
Quicken and FrameMaker and RoboHelp will quickly port to Linux, we'll all
move over the Star Office, and then Microsoft might reconsider their policies.
Steve Oppenheimer
Technical & Marketing Writing
writer -at- writemaster -dot- com
www.writemaster.com
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
The majority of Linux users fall into one of several camps. The first camp
is the free software advocates, who are against any proprietary software
and won't use it, no matter whether the
manufacturer is Microsoft, Adobe, or anyone else.This group is probably the
smallest of the three.
The second camp is the open source advocates.This group uses Linux because
of its stability, and the belief that open source software is of higher
quality, has fewer bugs,and develops quicker than proprietary software.
This group may use proprietary software if no other tool is available. For
example, Linus Torvalds, for whom Linux is named, insists on using a piece
of proprietary software for kernel development (and has come under attack
for it).
The third camp consists of people who simply want to try something new.
This group has no strong feelings about Windows or any other proprietary
software one way or the other. This group is probably the largest of the
three, although the second is probably a close second.
I've listed these groups in order of their acceptence of proprietary
software in general and of Microsoft in particular. However, even the free
software advocates don't spend a lot of time thinking about
Windows. For many of them, Windows is mostly irrelevant. They may worry
about some of Microsoft's manoeuvers in the marketplace, and the second and
third group may keep Windows around to run an occasional program, but
that's about it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Experience RoboHelp X3! This new RoboHelp release combines single sourcing,
print-quality documentation, conditional text and much more, into the most
monumental release of RoboHelp ever! http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
Enhance, optimize and automate your FrameMaker-to-PDF workflow with TimeSavers:
Define all PDF features in your source FrameMaker files ONCE, distill MANY.
Bookmark Controller, Link Controller, UnBloat & more : http://www.microtype.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.