RE: STC and words

Subject: RE: STC and words
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:05:20 -0500


I side with Bonnie. They have no place in the type of discussion appropriate
for this forum.

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Barnes&Noble.com
jposada -at- book -dot- com
212-414-6656
"Be accurate...the 4am wakeup call you prevent could be your manager's"



>I would urge you to remove the sexual and scatological references from
> your text. They really have no place on a list such as this.

That type of language isn't how I usually express myself, so I have some
sympathy for your comment.

Still, so far as I can see, nothing in the Techwr-l Terms of Service or
Posting Rules forbids the language to which you object.

Besides, at the end of the day,they're only words, like any other words
- and nothing that you can't hear any day on the street or even in the
office.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Quick (probably dumb) Frame Question
Next by Author: RE: Quick (probably dumb) Frame Question
Previous by Thread: RE: STC and words
Next by Thread: RE: STC and words


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads