RE: December 2002 issue of Intercom on PDF Book

Subject: RE: December 2002 issue of Intercom on PDF Book
From: "Lorraine Kiewiet" <Lorraine -dot- Kiewiet -at- mullinconsulting -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:02:59 -0800


WOW Thanks! This is why I love Techwr-L!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Shlomo Perets [mailto:mtype -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:53 PM
To: Lorraine Kiewiet
Cc: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: December 2002 issue of Intercom on PDF Book



Lorraine,

You wrote:

>In this month's Intercom, there is an article "Building a PDF Book".
>Maybe I am not reading this with my brain fully engaged, but I am not
>seeing the point of creating a manual in this way when it is so simple
>to take a document and use Acrobat Distiller to create the bookmarks for
>you.
>
>Although I cannot find it in the article, perhaps the reason for this
>approach is that the book is hundreds of pages long, and we all know how
>Word cannot manage that. So it seems that the point is, if your company
>won't buy you FrameMaker and you need a 500 page book, here's how to do it.

Regardless of the tools used to author the PDFs, and unless the
intended use is print-only -- a manual can benefit from conversion to
a set of interlinked PDFs (each chapter being a separate PDF) rather
than to a single-file PDF. When done properly, benefits include:

- Acrobat Search can be more efficient (assuming that each chapter
has unique Title, Keywords fields - readers are able to select the
chapter of interest as the starting point, without having to click
"Next Highlight" repeatedly (until they give up)

- Reader orientation is improved, if the specific title is displayed
in the title bar

- Cross-chapter links may open the target chapter in a separate window

- Overall performance is better, especially with larger manuals

The combined file size of the separate chapters is larger than a single
file, especially when fonts are embedded (recommended), but this
is generally not a major consideration.

See my "PDF Best Practices" articles (especially #5 and #6) for more details
(http://www.microtype.com/resources2.html#PDFBestPractices).


Shlomo Perets

MicroType * http://www.microtype.com
FrameMaker, Acrobat training & consulting * FM-to-Acrobat
TimeSavers/Assistants






^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Order RoboHelp X3 in December and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: xMetal as a Help authoring tool?
Next by Author: Online Help Facility File Structure
Previous by Thread: Re: December 2002 issue of Intercom on PDF Book
Next by Thread: FW: Version Control software


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads