RE: The debate that won't die (was RE: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style))

Subject: RE: The debate that won't die (was RE: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style))
From: kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:46:02 -0700


Anita wrote:

> Finally, I did NOT state that "anybody" or "everybody" can write
> well if taught. Those generalizations were made by other people.
> I also specifically stated that the ability to learn was a requirement.


But how do you define "the ability to learn?" Most healthy people can
learn. And yet there are things I can't learn to do *well* (I dance like
Elaine on Seinfeld), and I still maintain that many people can NOT be
taught to write well.

If the ability to learn actually means "the ability to learn to write
well," then I guess you're right, but the people who fall into that
category are not the people I'm talking about. If it means "the
willingness to work hard against extremely challenging circumstances" -
such as those your brother faced - I still don't think that this category
covers the general population.

I contend that when dealing with the "average person" - the person who can
be taught to read, write, do math, and get through high school (which mean
this person DOES have the "ability to learn") - such a person can NOT
always be taught to write *well.* Some can, some just can't. I've seen it
time and again.

Your brother sounds like a gifted, intelligent, articulate person, and a
hard worker too, with a sister who's a strong communicator. It's not
surprising to me that he was able to learn to write well - he was in good
company, and may even have genetics on his side. But I think he does NOT
represent Joe Average. I was not surprised to see a teacher chime in on
this post, supporting my position.

We all have different gifts. But most of us also have some gaps. Lauren
Hutton's is between her teeth, but for some it's their literary ability.


Keith Cronin
whose hair is showing that it lacks the ability to learn to grow in
certain areas of his head


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Order RoboHelp X3 in December and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Who hires technical writers?
Next by Author: Re: All hail John Posada, the new TECHWHIRL King!!
Previous by Thread: RE: The debate that won't die (was RE: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style))
Next by Thread: RE: The debate that won't die (was RE: Remember secretaries? (was RE: Proof that content is more important than style))


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads