RE: Active verbs (was: Basic Voice)

Subject: RE: Active verbs (was: Basic Voice)
From: Kim Roper <kim -dot- roper -at- pixelink -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:05:10 -0500


Geoff Hart has some good points on this subject. On the other hand,
"enables," "provides," "allows," and the like are certainly at home in
technical marketing writing. In this arena, the function's benefits to the
user are the focus, rather than the functions themselves. This is an
important distinction.

Cheers ... Kim

New sig--33% less salt*
*compared to original sig




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Technical Writing Tests
Next by Author: RE: Tip of the week
Previous by Thread: Active verbs (was: Basic Voice)
Next by Thread: RE: Active verbs (was: Basic Voice)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads