Re: Who cares about ethics? (regulatory body)

Subject: Re: Who cares about ethics? (regulatory body)
From: Dawn Whitlock <dawn -dot- whitlock -at- tait -dot- co -dot- nz>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:34:32 +1200


Kim,

Do you think there *should* be a "regulatory body enforcing standards of conduct or
competence"?

Regards
Dawn

Kim Roper wrote:

> There is no professional regulatory body enforcing standards of
> conduct or competence.
> This does not mean that tech comms should not act professionally. Rather,
> it means that there is no regulatory body to define the rules or yank our
> ability to work in the field.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l/


Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Who cares about ethics? (clarification)
Next by Author: pdf printing problem
Previous by Thread: Who cares about ethics? (clarification)
Next by Thread: Re: Who cares about ethics? (regulatory body)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads