Re: Acronyms & Abbreviations--Just Say NO!

Subject: Re: Acronyms & Abbreviations--Just Say NO!
From: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:53:10 -0400




Tom Murrell :

>>Then why is so much time spent explaining them?

As you challenged another poster. Do you have the study handy backing up your
allegations that learning the acronyms uses up more resources than those saved
by using them in the first place?


>>And why is the hardest part of a new job learning the alphabet
>>soup of the new organization?

I doubt it's the hardest part. It's just one of the many things you have to
learn if you're going to be sufficiently technical/functional in a given field.

>>And, if I had a nickel (that's a five cent piece American) for everytime I
>>asked an old hand what a particular initialism meant
>>only to be met with a blank stare, I could have retired
>>five years ago.

While an interesting anecdote, I hardly think it's relevant. How many people
know what LASER or RADAR stand for? How many people know what they are? I'm sure
many more know what they are than what they stand for.

If the following were to be found in a document, how many would know what they
are?
- radio detection and ranging
- light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation

How many had to think about it even though the acronyms were included in this
post first? I think that the spelled out versions may induce more confusion than
the acronyms. I challenge anyone to pick up a technical or general knowledge
article on either subject and read the spelled out version instead of the
acronym each and everytime it appears. I think you'd have to be a liar to say
that the resulting document is less confusing or more communicative than its
acronym laden original.

It's not what the initialism or acronym means that's important most of the time
but the concept/system behind the initialism/acronym. If that concept is
correctly communicated to/interpreted by the reader and is appropriate for the
audience, where's the problem? Slap a glossary in the doc and there's no reason
for complaint.

Eric L. Dunn



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Robohelp X3, from eHelp, lets you quickly and easily create
professional Help systems for all your Windows and Web-based
applications, including Net.

Buy RoboHelp Office X4 by June 13th and receive
$100 mail-in rebate, Plus FREE RoboHelp Plus Pack.

Order RoboHelp today: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Boeing Tech Pubs going offshore? (long)
Next by Author: RE: Boeing Tech Pubs going offshore? (long)
Previous by Thread: RE: Acronyms & Abbreviations--Just Say NO!
Next by Thread: RE: Acronyms & Abbreviations--Just Say NO!


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads