RE: Feedback [LONG]

Subject: RE: Feedback [LONG]
From: Sean Hower <hokumhome -at- freehomepage -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT)



-----------------------------
John P. asks:
Is it better to include substantial content that's mostly right and mostly useful but unreviewed, or is it better to include substantially less content that is known to be 100% right?
-----------------------------

In general, I'd have to go along with the less content-more accuracy angle. However, in this case, I think your approach is fine, and probably just about the only thing you can do. I mean, your client is the HQ CTO, not the techies with a bad attitude. (And while I say that, I'm not implying that John should go about stepping on toes just because the techies aren't his client). I've been in a similar situation, but I didn't have the support of the people that hired us.


********************************************
"And in the morning, I'm makin waffles." ~ Donkey
Sean Hower - tech writer
http://hokum.freehomepage.com

_____________________________________________________________
Create your own web site for FREE at http://www.freehomepage.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE? "Mustang" is a NEW single
sourcing tool for FrameMaker that lets you easily publish your content
online. No macro language required! http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See www.mercer.edu/mstco or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Nielsen and PDFs
Next by Author: Re: CSS book recommendations?
Previous by Thread: RE: Feedback [LONG]
Next by Thread: RE: Nielsen and PDFs


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads