TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>> In a modern world...what is the advantage of having "Instrument
>> container, see toolbox" references, other than teaching readers that
>> "Instrument container" and "toolbox" are synonyms?
>> True, they've learned a new synonym, but then they have to look up
>> the information twice--is that good?
>My own experience tells me that this practice just frustrates me - when
>I see a "see other" reference, I sigh, flip to the appropriate section
>in the alphabet, locate the other "preferred" term, then flip to the page,
>all the while thinking, "if they were already taking the time to create
>the "see" reference, why couldn't they have just placed the page number
Captain Smarty-pants chimes in:
But, how annoying is it to want to find out about instrument containers, be
directed to a page in the manual, and only see information about toolboxes?
I mean, if I had wanted to read about toolboxes, I would have looked it up
in the first place, right?
Okay, so maybe this example is not the best. A reasonable native speaker
could guess that instrument container and toolbox may be referring to the
same thing. But, would a non-native speaker make that connection? I know
that my audience includes a lot of non-native speakers of English, and I
want to make sure that they can find the information they need so that they
keep buying my company's products and making my stock valuable. 8-)
I can also recall several times that I have found something in the index,
and the page that was referred to did not contain that term at all. It was
very frustrating trying to map what I was thinking of to what the page was
saying. Perhaps a see reference would have helped me map the terminology
that I was used to to the terms that appeared in the document. And
prevented me from cursing the entire lineage of the person who wrote that
PS-Vote and Voting Button appear in the Outlook 2002 index. Maybe they
finally got a decent indexer in there.