RE: interviews and ethics

Subject: RE: interviews and ethics
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: 'Sean Brierley' <seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:35:28 -0400

Not at is the manager who WANTS that person that must know how to
make the person who he wants different than the rest. Take the person out of
the 1% and make him a singular case.

Every corporate policy can be circumvented. I did it today with the policy
about personal-owned software on company assets. I had to justify it, I had
to convince the VP_HR that it was in their best interest to allow me to use
my copy of FM on their HW...this was against their hard-fast rule.

John Posada
Special Projects
Senior Technical Writer

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Brierley [mailto:seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: interviews and ethics

You're right.

So, it should give up on each and every one for a
$10,000 disconnect? I suppose it must . . .. See,
that's why I'm not good at this. I don't see that
paying one guy that $10k requires you pay it in the
other 99 instances, or that denying it in one instance
requires the denial in the other cases . . ..



--- John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com> wrote:
> Don't ya think that a multi-national company (and
> 10,000 employees is not
> that much) comes across at least 100 well-suited
> individuals over the course
> of a year??

This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be
and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If
you are not an
intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and take the steps
necessary to
delete the message completely from your computer system.

Not Intended as a Substitute for a Writing: Notwithstanding the Uniform
Electronic Transaction
Act or any other law of similar effect, absent an express statement to the
this e-mail message, its contents, and any attachments hereto are not
intended to represent
an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise
intended to bind
this sender, llc, inc. or any other
person or entity.


Previous by Author: RE: interviews and ethics
Next by Author: RE: interview and ethics
Previous by Thread: RE: interviews and ethics
Next by Thread: RE: interviews and ethics

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads