Numbering in Procedures

Subject: Numbering in Procedures
From: "Oja, W. Kelly" <w -dot- kelly -dot- oja -at- verizon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:05:57 -0500


I have a question for the list. I am currently revising a procedure, and
have hit a roadblock on how to set the numbering. The users/readers, do
not like numbering that goes: 1.0, 1.1, 1.1.1, 2.0, 2.1, etc. I have
managed to avoid it up until today. The numbering/outlining schemes I
used previously will not work with the current procedure because this
one is soooo involved.

The way I see it, I use the numbering system listed above and that is
currently in place for my revision, or... something else.

Any ideas out there on a overcast and gloomy Monday?


W. Kelly Oja
Verizon Airfone
http://www22.verizon.com/airfone/

Stay in Touch
Verizon Airfone JetConnect (SM)
Inflight e-mail, Instant Messaging, and more...



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Next by Author: RE: Leaving Techwhirlers
Previous by Thread: Re: About those technical skills - Was that H1B visa thingee
Next by Thread: Re: Numbering in Procedures


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads