Re: Best technical writing of the season

Subject: Re: Best technical writing of the season
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:19:40 -0500

Goober Writer wrote:
>>>> "Mixing takes approximately three minutes for
>>>> non-pulpy juice or5 minutes for pulpy juice. "
>>>
>>> That makes no sense whatsoever. I like it!
>>
>> That manual was for a machine that makes emu juice,
>> which I've never tasted.
>
> Right, but how does MORE mixing *create* pulp?
>
> And, I highly doubt you'll ever get to taste emu
> juice, as I doubt anyone has ever stuffed an
> ostrich-like bird into a contraption actually designed
> to pulvarize it into liquid. ;)
>

I read it as mixing to create some additional delectable (not the
juice itself), so that it was starting with juice that was nonpulpy or
pulpy. To incorporate pulpy juice into another recipe, it makes sense
that you'd need a longer mixing time.


Bonnie Granat
www.granatedit.com







References:
Re: Best technical writing of the season: From: Goober Writer

Previous by Author: Re: Best technical writing of the season
Next by Author: Re: Examining proficiency of job applicants in FrameMaker
Previous by Thread: Re: Best technical writing of the season
Next by Thread: Re: Best technical writing of the season


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads