TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Giving TW help: Are we training our replacements?
Subject:Re: Giving TW help: Are we training our replacements? From:"T. Word Smith" <techwordsmith -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:30:55 -0800 (PST)
Good question.
--- Chuck Martin <cm -at- writeforyou -dot- com> wrote:
>
> Bottom line: When answering pleas for help here, and
> in other online venues,
> are we in some cases telling people how our jobs are
> done fundamentally,
> people who are angling to take our jobs for lower
> pay, especially people who
> are "offshore?"
Yes.
I think about this, too. But, I can do nothing about
the fact that I:
1) Detest those cultures, cliques, and professions
that "hoard the knowledge at the expense of others,
because knowledge is power." I like to share. I enjoy
sharing. And, I have found, others do share back.
2) I would rather share what I've learned with 1,000
Pakistanis than suffer naive micromanagement from one
red-blooded American SME manager (engineer,
programmer) who won't give the time of day to consider
my profession or talent.
3) As a US-based technical writer, I have done jobs
for European companies. I have no problem with
European (or other) companies doing jobs for American
companies. That's the way it works. What I want is
savings to be passed along to the consumer. For
example, Adobe offshored FrameMaker--I would hope that
the extra profit doesn't all go to the CEO, but some
of it results in a lower-priced product (loss of jobs
is making us poor, we need a break on price) and the
reduced wages for programmers makes for an investment
in more programming talent to develop FrameMaker
further.
So, I would say the fears are well founded and we all
should consider them. But, I also suggest you consider
how your professional instincts, heart, and gut tell
you to behave ... and good luck! To a degree, we all
have to take a position on this and move on.