RE: Quark & Frame vs. Word

Subject: RE: Quark & Frame vs. Word
From: "John Posada" <JPosada -at- isogon -dot- com>
To: <lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:46:24 -0500

All of this may be true. However, from personal experience, as long as
I've been careful with accepting/rejecting all changes prior to applying
revision control, I've not had troubles using it. When I haven't been
careful, I've had all kinds of issues.

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Isogon Corporation
http://www.isogon.com

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word

John Posada writes:

> Numbered lists is buggy all on it's own.

I know, but Word doesn't admit it. However, they do admit somewhere in
the knowledge base that there's a problem with numbering in
rev-controlled docs.
They even provide a patch (which doesn't work). Still, don't quote me:
I'm working from a two-year-old whimpering-heap memory, which would
probably require years of therapy or bamboo under the fingernails to
return it completely to the light of day.





Previous by Author: RE: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Next by Author: RE: Mini Survey: Who uses XML?
Previous by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Next by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads