TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?
Subject:RE: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it? From:"Gordon Graham" <gordon -at- gordonandgordon -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:19:06 -0500
I've answered this question before with these four factors... which run
quite parallel to yours...
1. Enough budget
2. Enough time
3. Enough expertise
4. Enough management support
My list divides "brains" into the skills of the practitioners and the
support of the managers. I don't think that's too many words to answer this
time-honoured question, do you?
Notice that it doesn't take "oodles" of any item, just enough to do a
good-enough job. Which is unfortunately seldom enough the case.
============================
Gordon Graham, Partner
Gordon & Gordon
------------------------------------
Award-winning newsletters and
marketing writing for high-tech
------------------------------------
(514) 488-1875
www.gordonandgordon.com
============================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounce-techwr-l-114409 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
> [mailto:bounce-techwr-l-114409 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Goober
> Writer
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:52 AM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?
>
>
>
> > It takes:
> >
> > 1. financial commitment from a company,
> > 2. allotment of sufficient time for the tasks, and
> > 3. someone who can translate technical concepts.
>
> Too wordy...
>
> It takes:
>
> 1. cash
> 2. time
> 3. brains
>
> ;)
>
> =====
> Goober Writer
> (because life is too short to be inept)