TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Where does Documentation belong? From:Mailing List <mlist -at- ca -dot- rainbow -dot- com> To:'Isaac Rabinovitch' <isaacr -at- mailsnare -dot- net>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:36:23 -0500
Isaac Rabinovitch [mailto:isaacr -at- mailsnare -dot- net] blithely admitted:
> >>Yes, that's a common perception of documentation. But some of
> >>us have this whimsical
> >>notion that we write stuff people actually read.
> > There's medication available to help with that sort of thing.
> You mean medication to control my sense of irony, or
> medication to control my need to
> think that my work is useful? Either way, I can't believe the
> FDA has approved the level of mind control!
See? It's working already.
One more dose, and you'll go from "can't believe" to "can't care".
<g>
TW tie-in? If you can't be pragmatic about the likely fate
of your documents, then medicate yourself into detachment so
that you can keep churning it out and getting a paycheck.
/kevin
--
An optimist constantly suffers nasty surprises.
A pessimist constantly experiences pleasant surprises.
Think about that.