Re: Proofreading

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

I would consider this the fallback to having a second pair of eyes to do the
proofing.  Of course, much of the time, the fallback is the best we can get.
Having a good editor is always better.

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <twriter01 -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Proofreading


> 
> In response to "proofreading should be someone other than the other," what
> if the auther (me) has had time away from the document already. Let's say
> 2 days. Does your suggestion still apply? Keep in mind, this proofread is
> a FINAL proofread. The document has passed reviewers already. Some of them
> may have done some proofreading in their review and some not. Sorry if
> that wasn't clear.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.600 / Virus Database: 381 - Release Date: 2/28/2004

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER AS LOW AS $299! Offer expires March 31.
Publish your FrameMaker documents online -- quickly and easily!
                                                                                
New licenses are only $899 for one and $499 for additional licenses.
Use a competitor's product? Switch to RoboHelp for FrameMaker
for only $299! Buy today: CALL 1-800-462-4420 or 1 858-847-7900.
Hurry, offer expires March 31 2004.


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.