RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

Subject: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
From: "Bill Lawrence" <scribe -at- matrixplus -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:52:44 -0400


>
> WYSIWYG vs. Non-WYSIWYG is surely NOT the choice between using a DTP
> package using styles based purely on formatting vs. using a text
editor
> and hand coding element tags. I mean, come on! Those that have
succumbed
> to participating in this argument are either simply being contrary or
they
> have severe logic and perception problems. (IMO)
>

Sorry. I never meant to imply using Emacs for all writing. I use Epic
Editor myself, but I don't make any attempt to make it any more WYSIWYG
than it is out of the box and I leave it in "tags on" mode. Drag and
drop is a good thing.

Bill


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???: From: eric . dunn

Previous by Author: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Author: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Previous by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads