Re: Marketing view of documentation was Re: dispensing with documentation reviews

Subject: Re: Marketing view of documentation was Re: dispensing with documentation reviews
From: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- oddpost -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:01:41 -0700 (PDT)


Ned,

It shouldn't be against any of your professional pride or discipline to do the same thing the developers do with a new prototype...label the docs as "preliminary" or "alpha" or whatever to indicate it is not the finished product.

If you're still writing the finished doc, you should have a good handle on the design templates. Thus, whatever you have should *look* fairly good, right?

You may want to use a "watermark" on the pages to indicate the document is "preliminary" and a suitable disclaimer up front...and, in fact, you may well include contact info for collecting errata. That, properly handled, may give the users of this "test release" a feeling of ownership--and you may also get useful feedback in the process.

Where you do not yet have particular features detailed, I suggest you indicate that you know the material is missing, too. If yours is a somewhat typical development case, there is "feature creep" up to the last minute--then folks are screaming at the tech pubs department that *they* are delaying shipment of the finished product. Surely there are ways in which you can indicate that a feature is not yet stabilized enough for finished documentation?

David

-----Original Message from Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>-----

I committed a howler recently when I characterized the "marketing
view of documentation", and thanks to a poignant inquiry sent to
me off-line, I have purged any errant pejorative sense of
"marketing" from my vocabulary, and now retract anything that I
implied was attributable to the term "marketing" or the field of
Marketing in general. By way of explanation, I'd like to say
that the project I was describing, where I worked under the
"Marketing" department, was my sole project experience with a
marketing organization, and under the circumstances and in
retrospect, was probably far from normal. I am grateful for the
clarification in email about Marketing as a business function.
So, please let me clarify what I was trying to say; the message
has change little but the unintended insult to marketers has been
removed:

"Marketing" was the name of the internal group that wanted
incomplete documentation releases with all of the bows and
ribbons, like a finished product. Ann Pai may find this
interesting because that Marketing department was an example of a
group that had the power to drive the documentation requirements,
and used it in a way that ran counter to my professional values.
To them, the documentation, whether complete or not, would
fulfill their commitment to providing documentation along with a
test release of the software. If I had not understood the
special requirement for delivery of a good looking but incomplete
doc set PDQ, it would have seemed that Marketing had arrogated a
large portion of the tech writers' professional role, humiliating
us and our best efforts by shipping out a "pig with lipstick."

I didn't mean to extrapolate and attribute those situational
ethics to the ethics of the entire professional field of
Marketing.

Sorry if anyone else was insulted by my apparent slight of
marketers. I hope my meaning is clearer now.


Ned Bedinger
Ed Wordsmith Technical Communications Co.
doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com
http://www.edwordsmith.com
tel: 360-434-7197
fax: 360-769-7059



----- Original Message -----
From: "Ned Bedinger" <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: dispensing with documentation reviews

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Marketing view of documentation was Re: dispensing with documentation reviews: From: Ned Bedinger

Previous by Author: RE: TECHWR-L ADD Therapy
Next by Author: Re: Free, powerful graphics tool
Previous by Thread: Marketing view of documentation was Re: dispensing with documentation reviews
Next by Thread: Re: dispensing with documentation reviews


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads