Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers

Subject: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
From: "T.W. Smith" <techwordsmith -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:02:51 -0400


Sounds like we're on the same page (if you're not with us, you're
against us <g> ).

I don't know if MS adds them back. Isn't it easier to figure out what
is not getting used versus what would be getting used if it were to
exist? I asked Clippy, but he didn't know. <g>

Should we overdocument on the first release and then simplify ...
sorta like Adobe has done with the FrameMaker documentation?

Does documentation for commercial software really ever expand?

You got me thinking all about job satisfaction now <vbg>.

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:53:46 -0400, TechComm Dood
<techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> No contention there. Job satisfaction plays right into motivation and
> ambition. Without job satisfaction, it's very difficult to complete
> the circle I described above without there being some "burn" or
> "churn" in there somewhere.
>
> Ah, I think I do recall that now. But, that implies that the info was
> written. ;-) Also, there's a difference between documenting everything
> and delivering what's being used. I don't recall who posted that
> scenario, but by the same token, is there evidence that info that was
> omitted due to measured non-use may have been added back in upon user
> request?

======
T.

Remember, this is online. Take everything with a mine of salt and a grin.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: stevefjong
Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: TechComm Dood
Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: T.W. Smith
Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers: From: TechComm Dood

Previous by Author: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Next by Author: Re: WebWorks vs. RoboHelp
Previous by Thread: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers
Next by Thread: Re: 'Old fashioned' Tech Writers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads