Re: Code comments as Documentation

[TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>]

> > What a pathetic viewpoint.
> 
> Discussion that sinks to this level is not discussion at all. Play nice, or
> play alone.

I'm sorry, but how is this not playing nice, exactly? It's my
understanding that viewpoints, thoughts, and ideas were all fair game
here.

Someone also commented about sticks and stones...

I'm terribly sorry you took my reply as a personal attack, but if you
re-read it you should notice that it was not.

If by playing nice you mean biting my tongue and saying what you want
to hear, then I apologize but I cannot do that as I wouldn't then be
offering my own opinion - I'd be offering yours. However, if you're
looking a healthy discussion that challenges ideas, processes, and
mindsets, I'm game.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.