Re: a different resume red flag

Subject: Re: a different resume red flag
From: Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:37:05 -0400




Stephen Arrants wrote:

Dick Margulis said

I think we're on the same page--too much stress on one set of requirements is wrong. We all want to hire and work with people who know the tools, know (or can quickly come up to speed) on

the domain
knowledge, know how to interview, investigate, and write.

That's the first sensible thing you've said in this thread, Steve.


Wow -- that's a really snarky comment and attack.

Define snarky. Maybe I should take that as a compliment?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: a different resume red flag: From: Stephen Arrants

Previous by Author: Re: a different resume red flag
Next by Author: Re: a different resume red flag
Previous by Thread: RE: a different resume red flag
Next by Thread: RE: a different resume red flag


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads