Re: The End Of Technical Writing?

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

I think he means me, though I hardly consider myself a
"mainstay" here.  But on the off chance that it wasn't
immediately obvious, my post on that particular subject
(everybody posting about tools and not deeper subjects
because we had all mastered the deeper subjects) was
intended to be sarcasm...

Gene Kim-Eng


"Tony Markos" <ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote...
> 
> I was told by one of the mainstays on this listserv
> that the reason why there are so few End-User Task
> Analysis posts is because most of us TWs already have
> that issue licked, and that the REAL issues we face
> are how to use the tools.  In other words, we mainly
> face production problems, not writing problems. 
> Therefore, we should no longer have the title
> Technical Writer.  Our title should be Technical
> Communications Production Specialist.  And the name of
> this listserv needs to be changed from TECHWR-L to
> TECHCPS-L.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.