Re: The End Of Technical Writing Was RE: Re: a different resume red flag

[TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>]

LOL! What a troll!

OK, I'll bite. If end-user task analysis has been licked, why are we
still staffing tech support?

;-)

You can't write if you can't relate
Trade the cash for the beef for the body for the hate
And my time is a piece of wax fallin' on a termite
That's chokin' on the splinters



On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:06:37 -0700 (PDT), Tony Markos
<ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> 
> I was told by one of the mainstays on this listserv
> that the reason why there are so few End-User Task
> Analysis posts is because most of us TWs already have
> that issue licked, and that the REAL issues we face
> are how to use the tools.  In other words, we mainly
> face production problems, not writing problems.
> Therefore, we should no longer have the title
> Technical Writer.  Our title should be Technical
> Communications Production Specialist.  And the name of
> this listserv needs to be changed from TECHWR-L to
> TECHCPS-L.
> 
> Tony Markos

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.