RE: Fonts?

Subject: RE: Fonts?
From: "Broberg, Mats" <mabr -at- flir -dot- se>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:25:51 +0200


Quoting Dick Margulis:

> That's absurd. What was safe and more or less eternal in 1880
> or 1920 or
> 1950 or 1980 looks dated today; and there is no reason to
> suspect that
> what is safe and more or less eternal won't look dated ten
> years from now.

True, if you refer to layout and graphic design.

But probably not true if you talk about typefaces. A good typeface is a
typeface that does not look dated in 50 years, and the history of
typefaces are full of such examples. Take a look at book typography
between 1600 and today. Most books nowadays use the same typefaces as
were used then, with good result.

Best regards,
Mats Broberg
Technical Documentation Manager
www.flirthermography.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Fonts?
Next by Author: RE: Fonts?
Previous by Thread: RE: Fonts?
Next by Thread: Re: Fonts?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads