TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
[Fwd: Re: Can you suggest a way to manage this process?]
Subject:[Fwd: Re: Can you suggest a way to manage this process?] From:"Lisa A. Roth" <roth -dot- lisa -at- jimmy -dot- harvard -dot- edu> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:49:58 -0500
Hi there,
Your story is the story of my life, albeit I don't usually have such a
tight deadline.
As much as the WebWorks idea that someone offered is probably a good idea to improve efficiency later,
I am not confident that messing with new software is the bext plan, seeing that your deadline is tomorrow!
We currently work with paper copies for precisely the logistical reasons
you described in your message regarding tracked changes.
If I we you I would do this:
* Give paper copies for everyone to mark up by EOD with them being
returned to you.
* Burn the midnight oil processing the changes and making a matrix of
any conflicting feedback.
* Schedule a meeting NOW (to give advance notice) with all involved for
mid-morning tomorrow, at which time you will discuss with them any
conflicting opinions on particular pieces of text and seek a consensus.
One element that I must stress, though, especially with your schedule,
is that not every single person will possibly be able to review every
single change recommended by someone else. There's just no time for
that, and when time is tight, decision-making is needed--not a
re-opening of issues that were officially decided long ago (but perhaps
not to the satisfaction of all involved). There needs to be an
understanding that X person is the expert on topic Y, and his/her
changes will be implemented without a round robin asking every other
person in turn if it's OK with them.
If your situation is such that all seven are the experts on the entire
subject (unlikely but possible, I guess), then you could so it this way:
* Assign each person a section/chapter/whatever to mark up explicitly
but still hold each person responsbile for reading the entire thing. Any
changes a person wants to recommend OUTSIDE of his/her assigned section
must not be marked up on paper yet, but rather discussed in tomorrow's
meeting. This might help cut down on the conflicting opinions.
Just a few thoughts -- The first strategy works well for me; the second
is an off-the-cuff idea. I have to do this all the time!
O'Shea ,Elizabeth wrote:
I have to send a document for review today to seven different reviewers. The
impossible goal says all their comments and changes have to be reconciled,
implemented, and signed off by tomorrow evening.
We use Word. Track changes has been on since the content owner edited the
existing document. There have been substantial changes. There will be more
substantial changes when the reviewers get the document, and seven different
people will be making them.
ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!
RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.