RE: If X is first, what is the second?

Subject: RE: If X is first, what is the second?
From: "Wright, Lynne" <lwright -at- positron911 -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:09:08 -0500


The first sentence already states that the original launcher can remain the administrator. I also find that there are too many "system administrators"... so why not:


That person can remain System Administrator, or can assign that role
to anyone else. Subsequent administrators can remove the original System Administrator. The
[application] does not place a limit on the number of System
Administrators."

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-149168 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 2:53 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: If X is first, what is the second?



How about:

The original System Administrator can remain as the System Administrator, or any subsequent System Administrators can remove the original System Administrator from that role.

-Carla


-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-152696 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
day, December 03, 2004 1:50 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: If X is first, what is the second?



Hi, guys...It is Friday of a LONG week and I have a paragraph in my
SysAdmin doc that I'm fighting with (and losing). It goes like this:

---------------------
"After installation, the first person who launches the Administration
Console becomes, by default, the [Application] System Administrator
with all right and permissions.

That person can remain System Administrator or can assign that role
to anyone else. The **original** System Administrator can remain as
the System Administrator or the **second** System Administrator can
remove the original System Administrator from that role. The
[application] does not place a limit on the number of System
Administrators."
---------------------

I'm looking for a term to replace **second** since in reality, second
means anyone after the original one. What I'm NOT looking for is
comments on whether it is a good idea for the application to behave
the way it does. (note..in the doc, I don't use the asterisks)

=====
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Usability study?
Next by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question - Left or Right?
Previous by Thread: RE: If X is first, what is the second?
Next by Thread: RE: If X is first, what is the second?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads